Prof. Dr. Karin Ingold
Chair of Policy Analysis and Environmental Governance (PEGO) / Managing Director
Institute of Political Science
About Karin Ingold
Karin Ingold is professor at the Institute of Political Science at the University of Bern since August 2011 and is also affiliated to the Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (OCCR). She leads the research group of Policy Analysis and Environmental Governance (PEGO) affiliated to the Institute of Political Science at the University of Bern and the Department of Environmental Social Sciences at EAWAG.
Karin Ingold is Associate Editor for Continental Europe for the Journal of Policy & Politics and in the editorial board of the Policy Studies Journal, Swiss Political Science Review, European Policy Analysis Journal, Journal of Public Policy, and Connections. In her research, she is interested in the analysis and design of policy processes and instruments. Through her PhD and recent research, she became a scholar of the Advocacy Coalition Framework and other policy process theories. Methodologically, she mainly developed her skills in the conceptual development and application of social network analysis. Since 2008, she has been a co-organizer of the International Conference on the Application of Social Network Analysis (EUSN), and since 2013 she is in the Scientific Board of the European Conference on Social Network Analysis.
- Möhring, N.; Ingold, K.; Kudsk, P.; Martin-Laurent, F.; Niggli, U.; Siegrist, M.; Studer, B.; Walter, A.; Finger, R. (2020). Pathways for advancing pesticide policies. Nature Food, 1, 535-540. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-020-00141-4.
- Ingold, K. (2020). "Unbeantwortete Fragen im Advocacy Coalition Framework". In: Politische Komplexität, Governance von Innovationen und Policy-Netzwerke: Festschrift für Volker Schneider, eds. M. Nagel, P. Kenis, P. Leifeld und H. Schmedes. Wiesbaden: Springer, 91-98.
- Ingold, K.; Tosun, J. (2020). Special Issue “Public Policy Analysis of Integrated Water Resource Management”. Water, 12(9), 2321. DOI: 10.3390/w12092321.
- Angst, M.; Fischer, M. (2020). “Identifying Subsystems and Crucial Actors in Water Governance: Analysis of Bipartite Actor-Issue Networks.” In: Networks in Water Governance, ed. M. Fischer and K. Ingold. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 115-144.
- Herzog, L; Ingold, K. (2020). “Collaboration in Water Quality Management: Differences in Micro-Pollutant Management Along the River Rhine.” In: Networks in Water Governance, ed. M. Fischer and K. Ingold. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 203-238.
- Fischer, M.; Ingold, K. (Eds.). (2020). Networks in Water Governance. Palgrave Studies in Water Governance: Policy and Practice. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46769-2.
- Brandenberger, L.; Ingold, K.; Fischer, M.; Schläpfer, I.; Leifeld, P. (2020). Boundary Spanning Through Engagement of Policy Actors in Multiple Issues. Policy Studies Journal, online. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12404.
- Blake, K.; Nahrath, S.; Ingold, K. (2020). Combining the Institutional Resource Regime (IRR) framework with the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) for a better understanding of environmental governance processes: The case of Swiss wind power policy. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 141-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.010.
- Berardo, R.; Fischer, M.; Hamilton, M. (2020). Collaborative Governance and the Challenges of Network-Based Research. The American Review of Public Administration, online. DOI: 10.1177/0275074020927792.
- Pham-Truffert, M.; Metz, F.; Fischer, M.; Rueff, H.; Messerli, P. (2020). Interactions among Sustainable Development Goals: Knowledge for Identifying multipliers and virtuous cycles. Sustainable Development, online. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2073.
- Nohrstedt, D.; Weible, Ch.; Ingold, K.; Henry, A. (2020). “Comparing Policy Processes: Insights and Lessons from the Advocacy Coalition Framework Research Program.” In: Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis, ed. G. Peters and G. Fontaine. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
- Kammermann, L.; Angst, M. (2020). The Effect of Beliefs on Policy Instrument Preferences: The Case of Swiss Renewable Energy Policy. Policy Studies Journal, online. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12393.
- Weible, C.M.; Nohrstedt, D.; Cairney, P.; Carter, P.D.; Crow, D.A.; Durnová, A.P.; Heikkila, T.; Ingold, K.; McConnell, A.; Stone, D. (2020). COVID 19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives. Policy Sciences, online. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-020-09381-4.
- Kammerer, M.; Crameri, F.; Ingold, K. (2020). Das Klima und die EU: Eine Diskursperspektive auf die deutsche und schweizerische Klimapolitik. In: The European Social Model under Pressure – Liber Amicorum in Honour of Klaus Armingeon, ed. R. Careja, P. Emmenegger and N. Giger. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_34.
- Ingold, K.; Gavilano, A. (2020). “Under What Conditions Does an Extreme Event Deploy Its Power: Towards Collaborative Management in Swiss Flood Risk Management”. In: Collaborative Crisis Management – Inter-Organizational Approaches to Extreme Events, ed. F. Byander and D. Nohrstedt. New York/London: Routledge, 132-147. (PDF, 112KB)
- Fischer, M.; Jager, N. (2020). How Policy-Specific Factors Influence Horizontal Cooperation among Subnational Governments: Evidence from the Swiss Water Sector. Publius – The Journal of Federalism, online. DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjaa002.
- Pärli, R.; Fischer, M. (2020). Policy integration: Implementing the Agenda 2030 – what is the role of forums? International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, online. DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2020.1719546.
- Metz, F.; Angst, M.; Fischer, M. (2020). Do laws or actors integrate issues relevant to flood risk management in Switzerland? Global Environmental Change, 61. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101945.
- Dermont, C.; Kammermann, L. (2020). Political Candidates and the Energy Issue: Nuclear Power Position and Electoral Success. Review of Policy Research, online. DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12374.
- Pakizer, K.; Fischer, M.; Lieberherr, E. (2020). Policy instrument mixes for operating modular technology within hybrid water systems. Environmental Science and Policy, 105, 120-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.009.
- Narayan, A. S.; Fischer, M.; Lüthi, C. (2020). Social Network Analysis for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH): Application in Governance of Decentralized Wastewater Treatment in India Using a Novel Validation Methodology. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 7(198). DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00198.
- Widmer, A.; Herzog, L.; Moser, A.; Ingold, K. (2019). Multilevel water quality management in the international Rhine catchment area: how to establish social-ecological fit through collaborative governance. Ecology and Society, 24(3), 27. DOI: 10.5751/ES-11087-240327.
- Sciarini, P.; Fischer, M.; Gava, R.; Varone, F. (2019). The influence of co-sponsorship on MPs’ agenda-setting success. West European Politics, online. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2019.1697097.
- Kammermann, L.; Freiburghaus, R. (2019). ). Konsensdemokratie und die Transformation der schweizerischen Energiepolitik. dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 12(2-2019), 329-346.
- Ingold, K.; Varone, F.; Kammerer, M.; Metz, F.; Kammermann, L.; Strotz, C. (2019). Are responses to official consultations and stakeholder surveys reliable guides to policy actors’ positions? Policy & Politics, online. DOI: 10.1332/030557319X15613699478503.
- Fischer, M.; Nguyen, M.; Strande, L. (2019). Context matters: horizontal and hierarchical network governance structures in Vietnam’s sanitation sector. Ecology & Society, 24(3), 17. DOI: 10.5751/ES-11036-240317.
- Mewhirter, J.; McLaughlin, D. M.; Fischer, M. (2019). The Role of Forum Membership Diversity on Institutional Externalities in Resource Governance Systems. Society & Natural Resources, 32(11), 1239-1257. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2019.1646366.
- Sayles, J. S.; Mancilla Garcia, M.; Hamilton, M.; Alexander, S. M.; Baggio, J. A.; Fischer, A. P.; Ingold, K.; Meredith, G. R.; Pittman, J. (2019). Social-ecological network analysis for sustainability sciences: a systematic review and innovative research agenda for the future. Environmental Research Letters, 14(9). DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab2619.
- Bodin, Ö.; Alexander, S. M.; Baggio, J.; Barnes, M. L.; Berardo, R.; Cumming, G. S.; Dee, L. E.; Fischer, A. P.; Fischer, M.; Mancilla Garcia, M.; Guerrero, A. M.; Hileman, J.; Ingold, K.; Matous, P.; Morrison, T. H.; Nohrstedt, D.; Pittman, J.; Robins, G.; Sayles, J. S. (2019). Improving network approaches to the study of complex social–ecological interdependencies. Nature Sustainability, 2, 551-559. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0308-0.
- Weible, C.; Ingold, K.; Nohrstedt, D.; Henry, A.; Jenkins-Smith, H. (2019). Sharpening Advocacy Coalitions. Policy Studies Journal, online. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12360.
- Metz, F.; Glaus, A. (2019). Integrated Water Resources Management and Policy Integration: Lessons from 169 Years of Flood Policies in Switzerland. Water, 11(6), 1173. DOI: 10.3390/w11061173.
- Lieberherr, E.; Fischer, M.; Tschannen, A. (2019). Taking stock of institutional resource regime research: A meta-analysis. Environmental Science and Policy, 97, 81-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.003.
- Lieberherr, E.; Ingold, K. (2019). Actors in Water Governance: Barriers and Bridges for Coordination. Water, 11(2), 326. DOI: 10.3390/w11020326 / DOI in book publication: DOI: 10.3390/books978-3-03921-151-7.
- Andriamihaja, O. R.; Metz, F.; Zaehringer, J. G.; Fischer, M.; Messerli, P. (2019). Land Competition under Telecoupling: Distant Actors’ Environmental versus Economic Claims on Land in North-Eastern Madagascar. Sustainability, 11(3), p. 851. DOI: 10.3390/su11030851.
- Herzog, L. M.; Ingold, K. (2019). Threat to Common-Pool Resources and the Importance of Forums: On the Emergence of Cooperation in CPR Problem Settings. Policy Studies Journal, online. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12308.
- Fischer, M.; Maag, S. (2019). Why Are Cross-Sectoral Forums Important to Actors? Forum Contributions to Cooperation, Learning, and Resource Distribution. Policy Studies Journal, online. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12310.
- Angst, M. (2019). Networks of Swiss Water Governance Issues. Studying Fit between Media Attention and Organizational Activity. Society & Natural Resources, online. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1535102.
- Fischer, M.; Varone, F.; Gava, R.; Sciarini, P. (2019). How MPs ties to interest groups matter for legislative co-sponsorship. Social Networks, 57, p. 34-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2018.12.001.
- Ingold, K.; Driessen, P.P.J.; Runhaar, H.A.C.; Widmer, A. (2018). On the necessity of connectivity: linking key characteristics of environmental problems with governance modes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, online. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1486700.
- Kammermann, L.; Ingold, K. (2018). Going beyond technocratic and democratic principles: Stakeholder acceptance of instruments in Swiss energy policy. Policy Sciences, online. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-018-9341-5.
- Angst, M. (2018). Bottom‐Up Identification of Subsystems in Complex Governance Systems. Policy Studies Journal, Early view. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12301.
- Ingold, K.; Stadelmann-Steffen, I.; Kammermann, L. (2018). The acceptance of instruments in instrument mix situations: Citizens’ perspective on Swiss energy transition. Research Policy, online. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.018.
- Rapp, C.; Ingold, K.; Freitag, M. (2018). Personalized networks? How the Big Five personality traits influence the structure of egocentric networks. Social Science Research, online. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.09.001.
- Kammerer, M.; Namhata, C. (2018). What drives the adoption of climate change mitigation policy? A dynamic network approach to policy diffusion. Policy Sciences, online, 1–35. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-018-9332-6.
- Metz, F.; Leifeld, P.; Ingold, K. (2018). Interdependent policy instrument preferences: A two-mode network approach. Journal of Public Policy, online, 1–28.
- Maag, S.; Fischer, M. (2018). Why Government, Interest Groups, and Research Coordinate: The Different Purposes of Forums. Society & Natural Resources, online. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1484973.
- Kammermann, L.; Dermont, C. (2018). How beliefs of the political elite and citizens on climate change influence support for Swiss energy transition policy. Energy Research & Social Science, 43, online. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.010.
- Weible, C.; Ingold, K. (2018). Why Advocacy Coalitions Matter and Practical Insights about Them. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 325-343. DOI: 10.1332/030557318X15230061739399.
- Angst, M.; Widmer, A.; Fischer, M.; Ingold, K. (2018). Connectors and coordinators in natural resource governance: insights from Swiss water supply. Ecology and Society, 23(2), 1. DOI: 10.5751/ES-10030-230201.
- Brandenberger, L. (2018). Trading favors – Examining the temporal dynamics of reciprocity in congressional collaborations using relational event models. Social Networks, 54, 238-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2018.02.001.
- Cairney, P.; Ingold, K.; Fischer, M. (2018). Fracking in the UK and Switzerland: why differences in policymaking systems don't always produce different outputs and outcomes. Policy & Politics, 46(1), 125-147. DOI: 10.1332/030557316X14793989976783.
- Widmer, A. (2018). Mainstreaming climate adaptation in Switzerland: How the national adaptation strategy is implemented differently across sectors. Environmental Science & Policy, 82, 71–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.007.
- Ingold, K.; Moser, A.; Metz, F.; Herzog, L.; Bader, H.P.; Scheidegger, R.; Stamm, Ch. (2018). Misfit between physical affectedness and regulatory embeddedness: The case of drinking water supply along the Rhine River. Global Environmental Change, 48, 136-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.006.
- Malang, T.; Brandenberger, L.; Leifeld, P. (2017). Networks and Social Influence in European Legislative Politics. British Journal of Political Science, online. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123417000217.
- Ingold, K.; Fischer, M.; Cairney, P. (2017). Drivers for Policy Agreement in Nascent Subsystems: An Application of the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Fracking Policy in Switzerland and the UK. Policy Studies Journal, 45(3), 442–463. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12173.
- Kammermann, L. (2017). Factors Driving the Promotion of Hydroelectricity: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Review of Policy Research, online. DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12274.
- Metz, F.; Leifeld, P. (2017). “Governing Water with Market-Based Instruments: Preferences and Skepticism in Switzerland”. In: A Critical Approach to International Water Management Trends. Policy and Practice, ed. C. Bréthaut and R. Schweizer. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 147-176.
- Fischer, M.; Angst, M.; Maag, S. (2017). Co-participation in the Swiss water forum network. International Journal of Water Resources Development, online. DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2017.1374929.
- Metz, F.; Ingold, K. (2017). Politics of the precautionary principle: assessing actors’ preferences in water protection policy. Policy Sciences, online. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-017-9295-z.
- Fischer, M.; Ingold, K.; Ivanova, S. (2017). Information exchange under uncertainty: The case of unconventional gas development in the United Kingdom. Land Use Policy, online. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.003.
- Metz, F. (2017). From Network Structure to Policy Design in Water Protection: A Comparative Perspective on Micropollutants in the Rhine River Riparian Countries. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Dermont, C.; Ingold, K.; Kammermann, L.; Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2017). Bringing the policy making perspective in: A political science approach to social acceptance. Energy Policy, 108, 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.062.
- Angst, M.; Hirschi, C. (2017). Network Dynamics in Natural Resource Governance: A Case Study of Swiss Landscape Management. Policy Studies Journal, 45(2), 315-336. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12145.
- Jiang, D.; Fischer, M.; Huang, Z.; Kunz, N. (2017). Identifying Drivers of China's Provincial Wastewater Reuse Outcomes Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology. Online. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12584.
- Leifeld, P.; Wankmüller, S.; Berger, V.; Ingold, K.; Steiner, C. (2017). Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network. Plos One, online. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174671.
- Sager, F.; Ingold, K.; Balthasar, A. (2017). Policy-Analyse in der Schweiz. Besonderheiten, Theorien, Beispiele. Zürich: NZZ Verlag.
- Fischer, M.; Schläpfer, I. (2017). Metagovernance and Policy Forum Outputs in Swiss Environmental Policy. Environmental Politics, online. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1284981.
- Varone, F.; Ingold, K.; Jourdain, Ch. (2017). Defending the status quo across venues and coalitions: evidence from California interest groups. Journal of Public Policy, 37(1), 1-26. DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X16000179.
- Ingold, K. (2017). How to create and preserve social capital in climate adaptation policies: a network approach. Ecological Economics, 131 (January 2017), 414-424. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.033.
- Weible, C.M.; Heikkila, T.; Ingold, K.; Fischer, M. (2016). Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing. Comparing Coalition Politics in North America and Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-59574-4.
- Weible, C.M.; Heikkila, T.; Ingold, K.; Fischer, M. (2016). “Introduction”. In: Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing, ed. C.M. Wible, T. Heikkila, K. Ingold and M. Fischer. Palgrave Macmillan, 1-27. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-59574-4_1.
- Cairney, P.; Fischer, M.; Ingold, K. (2016). “Hydraulic Fracturing Policy in the United Kingdom: Coalition, Cooperation, and Opposition in the Face of Uncertainty”. In: Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing, ed. C.M. Weible, T. Heikkila, K. Ingold and M. Fischer. Palgrave Macmillan, 81-113. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-59574-4_4.
- Ingold, K.; Fischer, M. (2016). “Belief Conflicts and Coalition Structures Driving Subnational Policy Responses: The Case of Swiss Regulation of Unconventional Gas Development”. In: Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing, ed. C.M. Weible, T. Heikkila, K. Ingold and M. Fischer. Palgrave Macmillan, 201-237. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-59574-4_8.
- Ingold, K.; Fischer, M.; Heikkila, T.; Weible, C.M. (2016). Assessments and Aspirations. In: Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing, ed. C.M. Weible, T. Heikkila, K. Ingold and M. Fischer. Palgrave Macmillan, 239-264. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-59574-4_9.
- Ingold, K.; Lieberherr, E.; Schläpfer, I.; Steinmann, K.; Zimmermann, W. (2016). Umweltpolitik der Schweiz – ein Lehrbuch. 337 Seiten. Zürich/St. Gallen: Dike Verlag. Webanhang (PDF, 790KB)
- Fischer, M. (2016). Institutions and policy networks in Europe. In: Oxford Handbook of Political Networks, ed. J. N. Victor, M. Lubell and A. Montgomery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ingold, K.; Fischer, M., de Boer, C., Mollinga, P. (2016). Water Management Across Borders, Scales and Sectors: Recent developments and future challenges in water policy analysis. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(4), 223-228. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1713.
- Balsiger, J.; Ingold, K. (2016). In the Eye of the Beholder: Network location and sustainability perception in flood prevention. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(4), 242-256. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1715.
- Metz, F.; Fischer, M. (2016). Policy Diffusion in the Context of International River Basin Management. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(4), 257-277. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1716.
- Ingold, K.; Pflieger, G. (2016). Two Levels, Two Strategies: Explaining the Gap Between Swiss National and International Responses Toward Climate Change. European Policy Analysis Journal, 2(1), 20-38.
- Leifeld, P.; Ingold, K. (2016). Co-authorship Networks in Swiss Political Research. Swiss Political Science Review, 22(2), 264-287. DOI:10.1111/spsr.12193.
- Varone, F.; Ingold, K.; Jourdain, C. (2016). Studying policy advocacy through social network Analysis. European Political Science. Advance online publication, 27 May 2016. DOI:10.1057/eps.2016.16.
- Cranmer, S. J.; Leifeld, P.; McClurg, S. D.; Rolfe, M. (2016). Navigating the Range of Statistical Tools for Inferential Network Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 61(1), 237-251. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12263.
- Towfigh, E.V.; Goerg, S.J.; Glöckner, A.; Leifeld, P.; Kurschilgen, C.; Llorente-Saguer, A.; Bade, S. (2016). Do Direct-Democratic Procedures Lead to Higher Acceptance than Political Representation? Experimental Survey Evidence from Germany. Public Choice 167(1): 47-65. DOI: 10.1007/s11127-016-0330-y.
- Fischer, M.; Ingold, K.; Sciarini, P.; Varone, F. (2016). Dealing with bad guys: Actor- and process-level determinants of the “devil shift” in policy making. Journal of Public Policy, 26 (2), 309-334. DOI:10.1017/S0143814X15000021.
- Varone, F.; Ingold, K.; Fischer, M. (2016). Administration et réseaux d'action publique. In: Giauque, D.; Emery, Y. L'acteur et la bureaucratie au 21e siècle. Québec: Presses de l'Université de Laval, 115-140.
- Thomann, E.; Lieberherr, E.; Ingold, K. (2016). Torn between state and market: Private policy implementation and conflicting institutional logics. Policy and Society, 35(1), 57-69. DOI:10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.12.001.
- Fischer, M.; Sciarini, P. (2016). Drivers of collaboration in political decision making: A cross-sector perspective. The Journal of Politics, 78(1), 63-74. DOI:10.1086/683061.
- Kunz, N. C.; Fischer, M.; Ingold, K.; Hering, J. G. (2016). Drivers for and against municipal wastewater recycling: A review. Water Science and Technology, 73(2), 251-259. DOI:10.2166/wst.2015.496.
- Markard, J.; Suter, M.; Ingold, K. (2016). Socio-technical transitions and policy change – Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 215-237. DOI:10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003.
- Ingold, K.; Leifeld, P. (2016). Structural and Institutional Determinants of Influence Reputation: A Comparison of Collaborative and Adversarial Policy Networks in Decision Making and Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 1-18. DOI:10.1093/jopart/muu043.
- Fischer, M.; Maggetti, M. (2016). Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the Study of Policy Processes. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17 pp. DOI:10.1080/13876988.2016.1149281.
- Leifeld, P. (2016). Policy Debates as Dynamic Networks. German Pension Politics and Privatization Discourse. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 354 pp.
- Stadelmann-Steffen, I.; Ingold, K. (2015). Ist der Name schon Programm? Die GLP-Wählerschaft und ihre grünen und freisinnigen Wurzeln. In: Freitag; M.; Vatter, A.: Wahlen und Wählerschaft in der Schweiz. NZZ Libro Verlag, 217-244.
- Fischer, M. (2015). Institutions and coalitions in policy processes: A cross-sectoral comparison. Journal of Public Policy, 35(2), 245-268. DOI:10.1017/S0143814X14000166.
- Fischer, M. (2015). Collaboration patterns, external shocks and uncertainty: Swiss nuclear energy politics before and after Fukushima. Energy Policy, 86, 520-528. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.007.
- Kunz, N. C.; Fischer, M.; Ingold, K.; Hering, J. G. (2015). Why do some water utilities recycle more than others? A qualitative comparative analysis in New South Wales, Australia. Environmental Science and Technology, 49(14), 8287-8296. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.5b01827.
- Fischer, M.; Leifeld, P. (2015). Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for? Policy Sciences, 48(3), 363-382. DOI:10.1007/s11077-015-9224-y.
- Sciarini, P.; Fischer, M.; Traber, D. (2015). Political Decision-Making in Switzerland. The Consensus Model under Pressure, 304 pp. DOI:10.1057/9781137508607.
- Ingold, K. (2015). Identifizierung von Koalitionen in Politikprozessen illustriert anhand der Schweizer Klimapolitik. Zwei strukturelle Ansätze. In: Gamper, M.; Reschke, L.; Düring, M.: Knoten und Kanten III – Soziale Netzwerkanalyse in Geschichts- und Politikforschung. Transkript Verlag, Bielefeld, 373-398.
- Ingold, K.; Varone, F. (2015). Is the Swiss Constitution really constitutional? Testing the “veil of ignorance” hypothesis over time. In: Imbeau, L; Jacob, S: Behind a Veil of Ignorance? Power and Uncertainty in Constitutional Design. Springer, 187-202. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14953-0.
- Fischer, M.; Sciarini, P. (2015). Unpacking reputational power: Intended and unintendeddeterminants of the assessment of actors’ power. Social Networks, (42), 60-71. DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.02.008.
- Ingold, K.; Christopoulos, D. (2015). The networks of political entrepreneurs: A case study of Swiss climate policy. In: Narbutaité Aflaki, I.; Petridou, E.; Miles, L.; Entrepreneurship in the Polis - Understanding Political Entrepreneurship. Burlington: Ashgate, 17-30.
- Tresch, A.; Fischer, M. (2015). In search of political influence: Outside lobbying behaviour and media coverage of social movements, interest groups and political parties in six Western European countries. International Political Science Review, 36, 355-372. DOI:10.1177/0192512113505627.
- Christopoulos, D.; Ingold, K. (2015). Exceptional or just well connected? Political entrepreneurs and brokers in policy making. European Political Science Review, 7(3), 475-498. DOI:10.1017/S1755773914000277.
- Sciarini, P.; Tresch, A.; Fischer, M. (2014). Europeanization in Parliament and in the Press. Swiss Political Science Review, 20(2), 232-238. DOI:10.1111/spsr.12101.
- Fischer, M.; Sciarini, P. (2014). The Europeanization of Swiss Decision-Making Processes. Swiss Political Science Review, 20(2), 239-245. DOI:10.1111/spsr.12102.
- Brönnimann, S.; Appenzeller, C.; Croci‐Maspoli, M.; Fuhrer, J.; Grosjean, M.; Hohmann, R.; Ingold, K.; Knutti, R.; Liniger, M. A.; Raible, C. C.; Röthlisberger, R.; Schär, C.; Scherrer, S. C.; Strassmann, K.; Thalmann, P. (2014). Climate change in Switzerland: A review of physical, institutional, and political aspects. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews - Climate Change, 5(4), 461-481. DOI:10.1002/wcc.280.
- Ingold, K.; Gschwend. M. (2014). Science in policy-making: Neutral experts or strategic policy-makers? West European Politics, 37(5), 993-1018. DOI:10.1080/01402382.2014.920983.
- Henry, A. D.; Ingold, K.; Nohrstedt, D.; Weible, C. M. (2014). Policy Change in Comparative Contexts. Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework Outside of Western Europe and North America. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(4, SI), 299-312. DOI:10.1080/13876988.2014.941200.
- Ingold, K., Fischer, M. (2014). Drivers of Collaboration to Mitigate Climate Change: An Illustration of Swiss Climate Policy over 15 Years. Global Environmental Change, 24(1), 88-98. DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.021.
- Metz, F.; Ingold, K. (2014). Sustainable Wastewater Management: Is it Possible to Regulate Micropollution in the Future by Learning from the Past? A Policy Analysis. Sustainability, 6(4), 1992-2012. DOI:10.3390/su6041992.
- Ingold, K. (2014). How involved are they really? A comparative network analysis of the institutional drivers of local actor inclusion. Land Use Policy, 39, 376-387. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.013.
- Fischer, M. (2014). Coalition structures and policy change in a consensus democracy. Policy Studies Journal, 42(3), 344-366. DOI:10.1111/psj.12064.
- Cappelletti, F.; Fischer, M.; Sciarini, P. (2014). ‘Let's talk cash’: Cantons' interests and the reform of Swiss federalism. Regional & Federal Studies, 24(1), 1-20. DOI:10.1080/13597566.2013.808627.
- Ingold, K.; Balsiger, J. (2013). Sustainability Principles put into Practice: Case Studies of Network Analysis in Swiss Climate Change Adaptation. Regional Environmental Change, 529-598. DOI:10.1007/s10113-013-0575-7.
- Fischer, M.; Sciarini, P. (2013). Europeanization and the inclusive strategies of executive actors. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1482-1498. DOI:10.1080/13501763.2013.781800.
- Fisher, D. R.; Waggle, J.; Leifeld, P. (2013). Where does political polarization come from? Locating polarization within the U.S. climate change debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), 70-92. DOI:10.1177/0002764212463360.
- Fisher, D. R.; Leifeld, P.; Iwaki, Y. (2013). Mapping the ideological networks of American climate politics. Climatic Change, 116(3-4), 523-545. DOI:10.1007/s10584-012-0512-7.
- Ingold, K.; Varone, F.; Stokman, F. (2013). A social network-based approach to assess de facto independence of regulatory agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1464-1481. DOI:10.1080/13501763.2013.804280.
- Leifeld, P. (2013). Reconceptualizing major policy change in the advocacy coalition framework: A discourse network analysis of German pension politics. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 169-198. DOI:10.1111/psj.12007.
- Leifeld,P. (2013). texreg: Conversion of Statistical Model Output in R to LaTeX and HTML Tables. Journal of Statistical Software, 55(8), 1-24. DOI:10.18637/jss.v055.i08.
- Lieberherr, E. (2013). Organisationsformen im Vergleich. Leistungsfähigkeit der Siedlungswasserwirtschaft in Zürich, Berlin und Leeds. Aqua & Gas, 93(2), 48-52.
- Lienert, J.; Schnetzer, F.; Ingold, K. (2013). Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 125, 134-148. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.052.
- Maggetti, M.; Ingold, K.; Varone, F. (2013). Having your cake and eating it, too: Can regulatory agencies be both independent and accountable? Swiss Political Science Review, 19(1), 1-25. DOI:10.1111/spsr.12015.
- Metz, F. (2013). Addressing micropollution by linking problem characteristics to policy instruments. Working Paper, 38 pp.
- Schneider, V.; Leifeld, P.; Malang, T. (2013). Coping with creeping catastrophes: National political systems and the challenge of slow-moving policy problems. In: Siebenhüner, B.; Arnold, M.; Eisenack, K.; Jacob, K.: Long-Term Governance of Social-Ecological Change. Abingdon: Routledge, 221-238.
- Towfigh, E. V.; Glöckner, A.; Goerg, S. J.; Leifeld, P.; Kurschilgen, C.; Llorente-Saguer, A.; Bade, S. (2013). Does Political Representation through Parties Decrease Voters' Acceptance of Decisions? Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2013/10.
- Fischer, M. (2012). Entscheidungsstrukturen in der Schweizer Politik zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. Glarus: Somedia, 11, 379 pp.
- Fischer, M. (2012). Dominance or challenge? An explanation of the power distribution among coalitions in Swiss decision-making processes. COMPASSS Working Paper 69, 39 pp.
- Hering, J. G.; Ingold, K. M. (2012). Water resources management: What should be integrated? Science, 336(6086), 1234-1235. DOI:10.1126/science.1218230.
- Ingold, K.; Varone, F. (2012). Treating policy brokers seriously: Evidence from the climate policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 319-346. DOI:10.1093/jopart/mur035.
- Leifeld, P.; Schneider, V. (2012). Information Exchange in Policy Networks. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 731-744. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00580.x.
- Leifeld, P.; Haunss, S. (2012). Political discourse networks and the conflict over software patents in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 382-409. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02003.x.
- Lieberherr, E.; Klinke, A.; Finger, M. (2012). Towards legitimate water governance? The partially privatized Berlin waterworks. Public Management Review, 14(7), 923-946. DOI:10.1080/14719037.2011.650056.
- Fischer, M.; Ingold, K.; Sciarini, P.; Varone, F. (2012). Impacts of market liberalization on regulatory network: A longitudinal analysis of the Swiss telecommunications sector. Policy Studies Journal, 40(3), 435-457. DOI:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00460.x.
- Karin Ingold and Jale Tosun published an open access special issue in the journal Water named "Public Policy Analysis of Integrated Water Resource Management". They wrote an editorial where they outline how principles of policy studies can be brought together with dimensions from integrated water resources management (IWRM).
- With colleagues around the world, Manuel Fischer and Karin Ingold have published a new book on complex issues of global water governance at Palgrave Macmillan. In the 9 thematic chapters different case studies are presented, all of them using analytical network methods. The topics range from water management in Brazil, to conflicts in Swiss water policy, to water quality problems in Iranian rivers. Network analysis is applied descriptively, analytically or as modeling. The introduction and the conclusion show how network analysis can provide an appropriate specific perspective on complex environmental problems, but also how different challenges are involved in the analysis of water problems around the world.
- Karin Ingold is a co-chair of the 5th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences (ECWS-5) taking place virtual from 16-30 November 2020. Abstracts can be submitted until 16 October 2020.
- Karin Ingold and nine other international policy scholars analyzed the COVID19 and lock down situation from a policy perspective (see Policy Sciences article). In co-authorship with Manuel Fischer, Karin Ingold translated this analysis to the Swiss situation (see DeFacto article).
- Was lernt die Schweiz aus Umweltkatastrophen? – SRF Echo der Zeit, 12 August 2020, interview with Karin Ingold.
- Karin Ingold: “The issue with Greta Thunberg is one of democratic legitimacy” – Horizons Magazine, 4 June 2020, interview with Karin Ingold.
- COVID-19 in der Schweiz – eine netzwerkanalytische Perspektive – DeFacto, 2 June 2020, article by Karin Ingold and Manuel Fischer.
- Coronavirus: Schweiz setzt in der Krise auf Betroffenheit – Nau.ch, 25. April 2020, interview with Karin Ingold.
- Mensch erkrankt - Natur erholt? – Könizer Zeitung & Der Sensetaler, April 2020, Karin Ingold on the corona crisis and its effects on the environment.
- Ein Hochwasser, das die Schweiz prägte – Video on Youtube, 11 September 2018, report on a project with participation of Karin Ingold.
- Erwärmt sich die Erde mehr als 2 Grad, könnte das Klima kippen – Program "Context" on SRF 2, 17 April 2017, interview with Karin Ingold on the "El niño Costero" phenomenon.
- Viel mehr als eine grüne Bibel – Walliser Bote, 3 January 2017, report on a book project with participation of Karin Ingold.
- Wenn der politische Gegner zum Teufel wird, hat dies Konsequenzen auf die Politik – DeFacto, 16 July 2016, article by Manuel Fischer, Karin Ingold, Pascal Sciarini and Frédéric Varone.
- Networking ist Macht in der Politik – DeFacto, 11 March 2016, article by Karin Ingold and Philip Leifeld.
- Pragmatischere Töne von den Befürwortern – SRF 4 News, 30 October 2015, interview with Karin Ingold.
- Jetzt frackt China – Tages Anzeiger, 11 August 2015, Karin Ingold on Fracking in Switzerland.
- Furcht vor einer Energielücke bleibt – SRF 4 News, 26 November 2014, interview with Karin Ingold.
- Nano-Camp 2014: „Klimawandel erfahren“ – 3Sat, 5 September 2014, interview and cooperation with 12 young scholars.
- Klima-Verhalten: „Der stärkste Anreiz ist und bleibt das Geld“ – Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen SRF, 21 March 2014, interview with Karin Ingold.
- Klimaverhandlungen benötigen Leader – Neue Zürcher Zeitung NZZ, 19 November 2013, interview with Karin Ingold.
Welcome to the chair of Policy Analysis and Environmental Governance (PEGO)
In August 2011, the Institute of Political Science (IPW) at the University of Bern installed the Professorship of Policy Analysis and Environmental Governance (PEGO). This Chair was founded as a result of a fruitful collaboration between the IPW and the EAWAG (the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology). Since the beginning, Karin Ingold took the lead in this new research group. She is a political scientist and focuses her research and lectures on the analysis of policy processes, and instrument design. Karin Ingold has a particular interest in issues relating to natural resource management, water, energy and climate policy. PEGO is also affiliated to the Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (OCCR) research.
- Name / Titel
- Prof. Dr. Karin Ingold
- Chair of Policy Analysis and Environmental Governance (PEGO) / Managing Director
- +41 31 631 53 60
- +41 31 631 83 31
- +41 31 631 83 31
Group leader Eawag
- +41 58 765 56 76
- +41 58 765 57 49
- +41 31 631 83 31
- Name / Titel
- Dr. Marlene Kammerer
- Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (OCCR) / PostDoc
- +41 31 631 48 22
- +41 31 631 83 31
- +41 31 631 83 34
- +41 31 631 83 31
- +41 58 765 64 35
- +41 31 631 83 31
- +41 58 765 64 35
- +41 31 631 83 31
- +41 31 631 83 31
- +41 31 631 48 22
- +41 31 631 83 31
- +41 31 631 37 50
- +41 31 631 83 31
- +41 31 631 37 50
- +41 31 631 83 31
- +41 31 631 37 38
- +41 31 631 37 50
- +41 31 631 37 50
- +41 31 631 83 31
Spring semester 2019
Students of the Master Seminar "Climate and Energy Policy" re-invented the term paper: they compiled an innovative podcast dedicated to energy efficiency and climate change in the era of electricity liberalization. More here (Podcast). Authors: Klopfstein, Zemp, Naço, Ota.
Open Topics for BA- and MA-Thesis:
- Analysis of Swiss energy policy instruments: Actor coalitions over time. The decarbonization of the energy sector is a central issue in fighting climate change. Policy instruments can foster such a decarbonization. Such instruments should ideally persist over time in order to deploy their effects, but they also need to be capable of adapting to the inherent dynamics of technological change in this domain. We are looking for a Master student with a strong interest in Swiss climate and energy policy. The MA thesis is expected to cover the analysis of a given policy in the Swiss energy sector over time (several years to a decade). From a methodological point of view, the thesis should rely on Discourse Network Analysis (DNA) in order to reveal the positions and arguments of the most central political actors with respect to the design of such policy instruments. Potential topics are the feed-in tariffs or CO2 taxation, but other relevant and long-term policies can also be analyzed. A comparison with data from Germany is also possible. The thesis will be co-directed by Manuel Fischer (Chair of Policy Analysis and Environmental Governance group at Eawag and University of Bern) and the Energy Politics Group at ETH Zurich.
- Survey and appraisal of data management practices in the Swiss urban drainage management landscape. Switzerland invests up to CHF 1.2 billion annually in the maintenance of its current sewer system, primarily on the basis of the evaluated sewer condition. The evaluation is done by recording a video, watching the video, manually reporting the detected defects and estimating an overall condition score. Throughout this process there is a high degree of subjectivity and uncertainty, which leads to incomparable and non-reproducible results. In addition, often data are stored insufficiently due to limited time, financial resources, skills or clear ideas about their use for future applications, creating difficulties in accessing and using the information. Inadequate data quality and management hampers more advanced asset management solutions. When sewer inspection data become better curated, new opportunities for advanced asset management can be devised and contribute to extend the service life of infrastructure assets and move from mainly reactive to more predictive decision making. The main goal of this thesis is to assess the current data management practices applied in the field of sewer infrastructure asset management throughout Switzerland and identify ways to facilitate data-driven asset management.
- Political decision-making process on CO2-Act. The CO2-Act is the centrepiece of Switzerland’s climate policy. Its development and content were massively debated among the opponents in the climate policy subsystem. In particular, the conflict arises between powerful economic groups, traffic organisations, the oil lobby, and conservative political parties, on the one side, and environmental organisations, NGOs, and progressive parties on the other side of the political spectrum. The main contestation is and was the introduction of a CO2 tax on combustibles and motor fuels. The tax on fuels has never been successful until today. Policy analysis research closely investigated the policy formulation process in the past two decades. Specifically, under the auspices of Karin Ingold, elite surveys were conducted on a regular basis to collect data on policy beliefs and policy networks of the involved actors. This Master thesis aims to implement a new survey focusing on the most recent revision of the CO2-Act and to analyse the gathered data with methods from the Social Network Analysis toolbox.
- Influence of local decision-makers on flood prevention. Recent extreme flood events in Switzerland indicate that further effective and long-term flood prevention measures are necessary to protect municipalities and landscapes from flooding. Flood prevention in Switzerland is a shared competence of the federal government, the cantons and the municipalities. Fulfilling tasks of hydraulic engineering as well as the design, development and implementation of flood prevention policies is mainly the responsibility of the municipalities. In this context, several questions are raised: What role do the preferences of local decision-makers, e.g. a municipal council’s president, play for the choice of flood prevention measures in the same municipality? Which impacts does a municipal council’s political orientation have for the salience of flood prevention in the same municipality? This master thesis deals with these and similar questions. On the basis of a case study design, the aim is to analyze the impact of local decision-makers’ biographies on decision-making in flood prevention.
- Europeanization of Swiss Water Politics. Many policy sectors in Switzerland are confronted with an increasing internationalization and Europeanization – an adaption of policies as well as functional logics of policy processes to policies and processes at international levels. This phenomenon has an impact – among others – on the opportunities of Swiss political actors to influence policymaking. The prospective MA thesis analyses the respective mechanisms in the water policy sector – a policy sector that by definition has a strongly transboundary character. Among other international processes, the European Water Framework Directive influences policymaking in the non EU member state Switzerland.
- Biodiversity as a complex policy field. The prospective MA thesis deals with the complex actor constellation around biodiversity. Biodiversity concerns many different traditional policy sectors (water, forest, energy, land use planning, agriculture, etc.) and is influenced by policy processes (“Strategie Biodiversität”) on different levels of decision-making (from municipalities to international treaties). Theoretical approaches on policy processes and policy networks should guide the empirical analysis of the actor constellation in this field.
- Competence shifts to municipality associations. Municipalities are the lowest level in the Swiss multi-level system of political decision-making. They are under increasing pressure, given the challenges provided by technical developments in – for example – the infrastructure domain. One solution for municipalities to deal with these challenges and related lack of resources and expertise is to delegate certain competencies to municipality associations. The prospective MA thesis deals with the question why such shifts of competences are accepted or not by municipalities, and under what context conditions they are successful or not. The thesis analyses this question for the domain of wastewater and drinking water.
- Privatization of drinking water. The population of the canton of Zurich will soon vote on the revision of the integrated cantonal water law. The main reason for the high public interest and the conflictive discussions around the revision of this law is due to the fact that an element in the law explicitly provides the option for private firms to acquire parts of the drinking water supply system. The discussions in the canton of Zurich might very well influence related discussions in other cantons. The prospective MA thesis analyses the policy process and the actor network around the revision of the Zurich water law, as well as actors’ preferences and strategies around the question of privatisation of water supply against the background of policy process and network theories.
- Protection of deep groundwater. Deep groundwater is increasingly concerned by different uses such as the extraction of mineral water, geo-thermical drillings, future CO2 storage as well as the agricultural use of water due to climate change. The protection and the related coordination of uses (as for example through prioritizing given types of uses) needs to be adapted to these new challenges in order to prevent future problems in regulation and uncertainties for users. The prospective MA thesis prepares basic parameters related to this issue and identifies and critically evaluates relevant actors, interests, conflicts, opportunities for coordination and policy instruments related to the protection of deep groundwater.
- River restoration in Switzerland: Comparing cantonal strategies. In the next decades, Switzerland will restore (revitalize) an important part of its rivers. While the goals and basic criteria and financing mechanisms are defined at the national level, cantons are mainly responsible for identifying the river parts which should be restored. Swiss cantons thereby encounter different political and geographical challenges, and, as a consequence, organize their strategic planning of restoration measures in different ways, and rely on different criteria. Given the long-term task of restoring rivers, knowing how cantons plan their measures, and thus allowing for cross-cantonal learning over time, is crucial. The aim of the MA thesis is to compare cantonal planning processes, resources, approaches, and actor constellations related to restoration planning, and thus to identify why given types of cantons act in specific ways. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) might be a good methodological approach for such a comparison. (German knowledge required)
- Analyzing political decision-making processes of flood protection. Forecasts indicate that heavy precipitation events as a consequence of climate change will occur more often in the future, and thus, the risk of flooding will increase. This confronts politicians with the challenge to design and implement new adaptation measures on the local level. The design of appropriate instruments depends to a large extent on the actors involved in the decision-making process and the structure of their interactions. In 2012 and 2014, the Federal Council published his strategy on climate change adaptation and formulated his strategic approach to flood protection. The aim of the MA thesis is to find out, which actors were involved in the design of the strategy on flood protection and how their interactions were structured.
- International Water Governance in the “International Geneva”. This MA thesis has the goal to describe and analyze the set of international organizations based in and around Geneva and dealing with water issues. In this complex governance system, how are organizational characteristics related to organization’s issue portfolios or network positions? In empirical terms, the analysis should be based on an existing database (which might be expanded and completed, if needed). This MA thesis will be written in collaboration with the Geneva Water Hub (https://www.genevawaterhub.org).
- Conflict around river restoration. Agriculture, railways, motorways, drinking water supply and other land uses can be in direct conflict with more ecologically driven measures like river restauration. In this Master thesis, user and protection conflicts, and tradeoffs between different, often divergent interests should be systematically assessed and then, via a concrete case study, or case study comparison, empirically studied.
The Chair's main research topics are Policy Analysis, Policy Process Theory, Instrument Design, Environmental Policy and the Application of Social Network Analysis.